Land Use Changes as the Primary Driver of Wintering Mallard Distributions in the Mississippi & Central Flyways
Recent decades have seen a redistribution of wintering waterfowl across the Mississippi and Central Flyways. While climate change is frequently cited as a dominant driver of these shifts, some evidence suggests that land use and habitat change are primary forces reshaping where mallards winter, with climate acting more as an amplifier than a root cause. This distinction matters, because it reframes both how we interpret survey and harvest data and how future conservation and management strategies should be prioritized.
Gulf Coast Land Use Change and Shifting Winter Habitat
The Gulf Coast provides one of the clearest examples of how land use change alters wintering waterfowl distributions. Over recent decades, the region has experienced declines in rice acreage, expansion of alternative aquaculture systems, and extensive coastal wetland loss driven by saltwater intrusion. Much of this marsh loss is directly tied to land use decisions, particularly Mississippi River levees and channelization that have reduced sediment delivery necessary to sustain deltaic wetlands.
As these changes have accumulated, shallow freshwater habitats suitable for dabbling ducks have diminished. In Louisiana and across the broader Gulf Coast, this has coincided with a shift in species composition away from mallards toward teal, gadwall, divers, and other species better adapted to more saline, deep water, and less grain rich wetlands. These patterns potentially point more strongly to habitat-driven change than to direct climatic changes.
Northward Redistribution into the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
As coastal habitat quality has declined, several waterfowl species have redistributed north and east into the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Snow geese and white-fronted geese, historically more associated with Gulf Coast wintering areas, have increasingly concentrated in Arkansas and surrounding MAV states. Declining rice acreage along the Gulf Coast, combined with marsh conversion to open water, has reduced traditional foraging areas and shifted these geese toward interior agricultural landscapes where waste grain and managed wetlands remain available.
Today, Arkansas has emerged as a major winter destination for white-fronted geese. This broader, multi-species response reinforces the interpretation that land use and habitat availability, rather than climate alone, are restructuring wintering distributions across the flyway.
Arkansas Mallards, Survey Data, and Within-State Redistribution
Winter surveys conducted by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission do indicate some recent reductions in wintering mallard numbers along traditional survey transects. However, these surveys may not fully capture contemporary distribution patterns. Over time, one could argue, mallards have increasingly concentrated on a smaller number of high-quality, intensively managed wetland complexes, many of which may fall outside standard aerial or ground survey routes. In addition, mallard breeding populations have been in decline since a 2016 peak.
As habitat quality, food availability, and security have become more uneven across the MAV, mallards appear to have redistributed spatially rather than declined uniformly in the MAV. Properties managed for moist-soil vegetation, flooded row crops, and minimal disturbance routinely hold thousands to tens of thousands of mallards, often with notable year-to-year consistency. This concentration effect suggests that some declines inferred from survey data may reflect changes in detectability and distribution rather than a true reduction in the number of mallards wintering in Arkansas.
In this context, Arkansas may be better described as a landscape experiencing increasing polarization between high-quality managed habitats and increasingly marginal surrounding areas, rather than one broadly losing mallards.
Agricultural Practices, Hunting Pressure, and Concentration Effects
Across the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, changes in agricultural practices have further shaped mallard distribution. Earlier harvest dates, fall tillage, more efficient combines that leave less residual grain, and increasing hunter density on smaller habitat footprints have collectively reduced the number of landscapes capable of supporting mallards with both food and security. In response, mallards have increasingly concentrated on intensively managed wetland complexes that provide reliable forage and limited disturbance.
These patterns are consistent with redistribution driven by habitat quality. High-end properties managed explicitly for waterfowl continue to support large wintering populations, while marginal landscapes increasingly fail to do so.
Climate Change as an Amplifier
Climate change likely plays a secondary but important role by modifying how birds respond to existing habitat conditions. Milder winters may allow mallards to remain sedentary once they settle into high-quality wetland complexes, reducing the energetic demand that would otherwise force birds to range more widely across the landscape. In the Midwest, rivers that remain ice-free longer adjacent to no-till cornfields may allow birds to stage farther north for extended periods.
At the same time, pre-solstice cold fronts continue to play a significant role in accelerating early migration events, indicating that photoperiod and weather timing remain critical drivers of movement. In this framework, climate does not replace habitat as the primary driver but may amplify the effects of land use change by reinforcing concentration once birds settle.
Interspecific Competition and Food Availability in the MAV
An additional variable that may be influencing mallard distribution within the Mississippi Alluvial Valley is food availability under increasing interspecific competition. The growing concentration of light geese and white-fronted geese in Arkansas has the potential to increase competition for waste grain and moist-soil resources that historically supported large numbers of wintering mallards. Geese are highly efficient foragers and, under certain conditions, can rapidly deplete standing and residual food resources in agricultural landscapes.
If such competitive interactions are occurring, mallards may be increasingly constrained to managed wetland complexes where food availability is deliberately maintained and disturbance is controlled. In this scenario, competition would act alongside habitat loss and redistribution to reinforce observed patterns of concentration, with mallards persisting in high numbers primarily in landscapes capable of sustaining both energetic demand and heightened competition from other waterfowl species. While additional data would be needed to quantify this effect, interspecific competition represents a plausible contributing factor within a broader land use driven redistribution framework.
Conclusion
Taken together, these observations could suggest that land use and habitat change are the dominant drivers of mallard redistribution across the Mississippi Flyway, with climate change acting primarily as an amplifier rather than a primary cause. Coastal habitat loss along the Gulf Coast, agricultural, and disturbance-related changes within the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, and increasing concentration of both ducks and geese onto fewer high-quality landscapes have collectively reshaped wintering distributions. Understanding this distinction is critical, because it implies that future mallard abundance and distribution will continue to be shaped largely by management decisions and land use outcomes, rather than by climate trajectories alone. Mallards display strong fidelity to wintering sites, but remain highly plastic in their wintering behavior, responding quickly to declines in habitat quality such as reduced food availability, increased pressure, and disturbance by redistributing across the landscape. This responsiveness underscores the opportunity for Arkansas to influence mallard wintering abundance through deliberate investments in habitat quality and disturbance management.
References
Arkansas Historic Preservation Program. (n.d.). Grand Prairie of Arkansas (2nd ed.). Arkansas Department of Arkansas Heritage. Retrieved from https://www.arkansasheritage.com/docs/default-source/anhc-educational-resources/grand-prairie-of-arkansas-2nd-ed.pdf?sfvrsn=3f130099_6
Askren, R. J., Massey, E. R., James, J. D., & Osborne, D. C. (2022). Migration chronology and multi-scale habitat selection of wintering midcontinent greater white-fronted geese. Journal of Wildlife Management, 86(8), e22334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22334
Bakner, N. W., Masto, N. M., Highway, C. J., Keever, A. C., Holmes, L. P., Steelman, N. J., Hagy, H. M., Feddersen, J. C., Pierce, A. R., & Cohen, B. S. (2025). Balancing opposing cues: Seasonal shifts in push–pull drivers of migration in a temperate waterfowl species. Movement Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00605-x
Pearse, A. T., Szymanski, M. L., Anchor, C. A., Anteau, M. J., Murano, R. M., Brandt, D. A., & Stafford, J. D. (2023). Factors influencing autumn–winter movements of midcontinent mallards and consequences for harvest and habitat management. Ecology and Evolution, 13, e10605. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10605
Gilbert, B. A., Paxton, E. H., Fontana, K. C., Grayson, K. L., & Walters, J. R. (2023). Within-winter shifts in waterfowl stopover use along the Pacific Flyway and implications for surveys and wetland management. Ecological Indicators, 152, 110157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110157
University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture. (2017, October 26). Where rice fields go, the geese are sure to follow. UAEX News. https://www.uaex.uada.edu/media-resources/news/2017/october2017/10-26-2017-Ark-rice-ag-shifting-migration-patterns.aspx
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2025). Waterfowl Population Status Report 2025 (Report No. FWS-HQ-MB-2025-09). U.S. Department of the Interior. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025-09/waterfowl-population-status-report-2025.pdf